Updated as of February 6. The Transylvania Open 2026 is a WTA 250 tournament played in Romania’s Cluj-Napoca. With the first day of the main draw upon us, all qualifying results are in. This page is built to follow the tournament match by match, day by day, with results updated regularly as the event unfolds.
The event features players such as Emma Raducanu, Sorana Cirstea, Anastasia Potapova, Olga Danilovic, and Xinyu Wang, among others.
What You’ll Find Here Throughout the Week
From February 1 to February 7, you’ll find every women’s singles score here, with each daily update reflecting the latest action as the draw narrows and the stakes rise.
This article will be updated round by round with all WTA match scores from Cluj-Napoca, from first-round openers to the championship match. Alongside the results, you’ll find the full schedule, draw context, and clear pathways showing who is playing whom and when.
On this page
Main Draw Results
Final
February 7
Emma Raducanu (Gbr) vs. Sorana Cirstea (Rom) 0-6 2-6
Full match report from the Transylvania Open final
Emma Raducanu vs Sorana Cirstea – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Emma Raduc equals=”1″anu | Sorana Cirstea |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 0.48 | 2.07 |
| Serve Rating | 140 | 281 |
| Aces | 0 | 6 |
| Double Faults | 6 | 2 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (36/52) | 51% (19/37) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 50% (18/36) | 84% (16/19) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 13% (2/16) | 56% (10/18) |
| Break Points Saved | 57% (8/14) | 0% (0/1) |
| Service Games | 14% (1/7) | 86% (6/7) |
| Ace % | 0% | 16.2% |
| Double Fault % | 11.5% | 5.4% |
| Return Rating | 174 | 267 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 16% (3/19) | 50% (18/36) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 44% (8/18) | 88% (14/16) |
| Break Points Won | 100% (1/1) | 43% (6/14) |
| Return Games | 14% (1/7) | 86% (6/7) |
| Pressure Points | 60% (9/15) | 40% (6/15) |
| Service Points | 38% (20/52) | 70% (26/37) |
| Return Points | 30% (11/37) | 62% (32/52) |
| Total Points | 35% (31/89) | 65% (58/89) |
| Match Duration | 1h04m | |
| Location | Local Start Time |
|---|---|
| Melbourne | 01:30 (+1 day) |
| New Delhi | 20:00 |
| Moscow | 17:30 |
| Kyiv | 16:30 |
| Cluj-Napoca | 16:30 |
| Berlin · Brussels · Paris · Madrid | 15:30 |
| London | 14:30 |
| New York | 09:30 |
| Buenos Aires | 11:30 |
| California (Los Angeles) | 06:30 |
Semi-Finals
Both semi-finals at the Transylvania Open offered sharply contrasting narratives, setting up a compelling final in Cluj.
Emma Raducanu ended her long wait for another WTA final by outlasting Oleksandra Oliynykova 7–5, 3–6, 6–3 in a bruising 2h48m encounter. The Briton absorbed pressure throughout, responded after a mid-match dip, and raised her level late in the decider, stringing together decisive points when the match hung in the balance.
Earlier, home favorite Sorana Cirstea delivered a statement performance, sweeping aside qualifier Daria Snigur 6–0, 6–3 in just 56 minutes. The Romanian struck cleanly from the start, dictated rallies from the baseline, and left no opening as she surged into the final in emphatic fashion.
February 6
Emma Raducanu (Gbr) vs. Oleksandra Oliynykova (Ukr) 7-5 3-6 6-3
Emma Raducanu vs Oleksandra Oliynykova – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Emma Raducanu | Oleksandra Oliynykova |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 1.15 | 0.87 |
| Serve Rating | 235 | 217 |
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults | 5 | 6 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (73/99) | 72% (73/101) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 68% (50/73) | 62% (45/73) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 31% (8/26) | 29% (8/28) |
| Break Points Saved | 62% (8/13) | 57% (8/14) |
| Service Games | 67% (10/15) | 60% (9/15) |
| Ace % | 0% | 0% |
| Double Fault % | 5.1% | 5.9% |
| Return Rating | 192 | 172 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 38% (28/73) | 32% (23/73) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 71% (20/28) | 69% (18/26) |
| Break Points Won | 43% (6/14) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Games | 40% (6/15) | 33% (5/15) |
| Pressure Points | 52% (14/27) | 48% (13/27) |
| Service Points | 59% (58/99) | 52% (53/101) |
| Return Points | 48% (48/101) | 41% (41/99) |
| Total Points | 53% (106/200) | 47% (94/200) |
| Match Duration | 2h48m | |
Sorana Cirstea (Rom) vs. Daria Snigur (Ukr) (Q) 6-0 6-3
Sorana Cirstea vs Daria Snigur – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Sorana Cirstea | Daria Snigur |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 2.09 | 0.48 |
| Serve Rating | 307 | 194 |
| Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (27/46) | 64% (28/44) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 78% (21/27) | 50% (14/28) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 68% (13/19) | 38% (6/16) |
| Break Points Saved | 100% (2/2) | 50% (4/8) |
| Service Games | 100% (8/8) | 43% (3/7) |
| Ace % | 6.5% | 0% |
| Double Fault % | 2.2% | 2.3% |
| Return Rating | 220 | 54 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 50% (14/28) | 22% (6/27) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 63% (10/16) | 32% (6/19) |
| Break Points Won | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Games | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/8) |
| Pressure Points | 60% (6/10) | 40% (4/10) |
| Service Points | 74% (34/46) | 45% (20/44) |
| Return Points | 55% (24/44) | 26% (12/46) |
| Total Points | 64% (58/90) | 36% (32/90) |
| Match Set Duration | 0h56m | |
Quarter-finals
February 5
The Transylvania Open quarter-finals delivered authority, resilience, and late drama.
Emma Raducanu produced her most convincing performance of the week, brushing aside qualifier Maja Chwalinska with relentless returning and outstanding efficiency behind her second serve.
Oleksandra Oliynykova extended her breakthrough run by outlasting Xinyu Wang, thriving in the key moments and showing remarkable composure on break points.
Home favourite Sorana Cîrstea lifted the Cluj crowd, edging Anastasia Potapova with sharper serving and superior execution under pressure.
The day ended with a twist as qualifier Daria Snigur stunned Yuan Yue, recovering from a bagel to complete a gritty three-set comeback and reach the semi-finals.
Raducanu E. (Gbr) vs. Chwalinska M. (Pol) (Q) 6-0 6-4
Emma Raducanu vs Maja Chwalinska – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Emma Raducanu | Maja Chwalinska |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 2.36 | 0.42 |
| Serve Rating | 304 | 185 |
| Aces | 0 | 4 |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (24/39) | 70% (31/44) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 75% (18/24) | 55% (17/31) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 80% (12/15) | 23% (3/13) |
| Break Points Saved | 0% (0/1) | 17% (1/6) |
| Service Games | 88% (7/8) | 38% (3/8) |
| Ace % | 0% | 9.1% |
| Double Fault % | 2.6% | 11.4% |
| Return Rating | 268 | 158 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 45% (14/31) | 25% (6/24) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 77% (10/13) | 20% (3/15) |
| Break Points Won | 83% (5/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Games | 63% (5/8) | 13% (1/8) |
| Pressure Points | 71% (5/7) | 29% (2/7) |
| Service Points | 77% (30/39) | 45% (20/44) |
| Return Points | 55% (24/44) | 23% (9/39) |
| Total Points | 65% (54/83) | 35% (29/83) |
| Match Duration | 1h11m | |
Wang Xin. (Chn) vs. Oliynykova O. (Ukr) 4-6 4-6
Xinyu Wang vs Oleksandra Oliynykova – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Xinyu Wang | Oleksandra Oliynykova |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 0.89 | 1.12 |
| Serve Rating | 235 | 266 |
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (44/67) | 77% (71/92) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 52% (23/44) | 61% (43/71) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 57% (13/23) | 52% (12/23) |
| Break Points Saved | 56% (5/9) | 91% (20/22) |
| Service Games | 60% (6/10) | 80% (8/10) |
| Ace % | 1.5% | 0% |
| Double Fault % | 1.5% | 4.3% |
| Return Rating | 116 | 175 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 39% (28/71) | 48% (21/44) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 48% (11/23) | 43% (10/23) |
| Break Points Won | 9% (2/22) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Games | 20% (2/10) | 40% (4/10) |
| Pressure Points | 23% (7/31) | 77% (24/31) |
| Service Points | 54% (36/67) | 59% (54/92) |
| Return Points | 41% (38/92) | 46% (31/67) |
| Total Points | 47% (74/159) | 53% (85/159) |
| Match Duration | 2h01m | |
Potapova A. (Aut) vs. Cirstea S. (Rom) 5-7 4-6
Anastasia Potapova vs Sorana Cirstea – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Anastasia Potapova | Sorana Cirstea |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 0.71 | 1.40 |
| Serve Rating | 212 | 269 |
| Aces | 0 | 2 |
| Double Faults | 7 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (58/114) | 51% (36/71) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 67% (39/58) | 78% (28/36) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 37% (19/51) | 56% (20/36) |
| Break Points Saved | 83% (19/23) | 71% (5/7) |
| Service Games | 64% (7/11) | 82% (9/11) |
| Ace % | 0% | 2.8% |
| Double Fault % | 6.1% | 0% |
| Return Rating | 113 | 149 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 22% (8/36) | 33% (19/58) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 44% (16/36) | 63% (32/51) |
| Break Points Won | 29% (2/7) | 17% (4/23) |
| Return Games | 18% (2/11) | 36% (4/11) |
| Pressure Points | 70% (21/30) | 30% (9/30) |
| Service Points | 53% (60/114) | 66% (47/71) |
| Return Points | 34% (24/71) | 47% (54/114) |
| Total Points | 45% (84/185) | 55% (101/185) |
| Match Duration | 2h01m | |
Yuan Y. (Chn) vs. Snigur D. (Ukr) (Q) 6-4 0-6 5-7
Yuan Yue vs Daria Snigur – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Yuan | Snigur |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 0.89 | 1.13 |
| Serve Rating | 203 | 252 |
| Aces | 6 | 0 |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (50/93) | 78% (82/105) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 66% (33/50) | 57% (47/82) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 30% (13/43) | 48% (11/23) |
| Break Points Saved | 42% (5/12) | 64% (7/11) |
| Service Games | 50% (7/14) | 71% (10/14) |
| Ace % | 6.5% | 0% |
| Double Fault % | 3.2% | 1.9% |
| Return Rating | 160 | 212 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 43% (35/82) | 34% (17/50) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 52% (12/23) | 70% (30/43) |
| Break Points Won | 36% (4/11) | 58% (7/12) |
| Return Games | 29% (4/14) | 50% (7/14) |
| Pressure Points | 39% (9/23) | 61% (14/23) |
| Service Points | 49% (46/93) | 55% (58/105) |
| Return Points | 45% (47/105) | 51% (47/93) |
| Total Points | 47% (93/198) | 53% (105/198) |
| Match Duration | 2h16m | |
Round of 16
February 3-4 (finished)
Raducanu E. (Gbr) – Juvan K. (Slo) 7-5 6-1
Emma Raducanu underlined her status as the top seed at the Transylvania Open with a strong 7–5, 6–1 victory over Kaja Juvan, overcoming a difficult start to book her place in the quarterfinals.
The Briton looked in serious trouble early on, falling behind 0–5 in the opening set and facing a potential one-set deficit. However, Raducanu mounted an impressive comeback, winning seven consecutive games to turn the set around and take it 7–5. That momentum carried over into the second set, where she took full control of the match, stringing together 11 games in a row.
From the baseline Raducanu was the more stable player in the key moments, closing out the contest in 1 hour and 37 minutes and winning 13 of the final 14 games to seal a convincing straight-sets win.
Emma Raducanu vs Kaja Juvan – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Raducanu | Juvan |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 1.36 | 0.73 |
| Serve Rating | 234 | 155 |
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (47/73) | 60% (31/52) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 51% (24/47) | 42% (13/31) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 59% (16/27) | 33% (7/21) |
| Break Points Saved | 60% (6/10) | 46% (6/13) |
| Service Games | 60% (6/10) | 22% (2/9) |
| Ace % | 2.7% | 1.9% |
| Double Fault % | 2.7% | 5.8% |
| Return Rating | 257 | 170 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 58% (18/31) | 49% (23/47) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 67% (14/21) | 41% (11/27) |
| Break Points Won | 54% (7/13) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Games | 78% (7/9) | 40% (4/10) |
| Pressure Points | 57% (13/23) | 43% (10/23) |
| Service Points | 53% (39/73) | 37% (19/52) |
| Return Points | 63% (33/52) | 47% (34/73) |
| Total Points | 58% (72/125) | 42% (53/125) |
| Match Duration | 1h37m | |
Chwalinska M. (Pol) (Q) – Danilovic O. (Srb) 6-1 1-6 6-2
Maja Chwalinska vs Olga Danilovic – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Maja Chwalinska | Olga Danilovic |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 1.14 | 0.88 |
| Serve Rating | 240 | 213 |
| Aces | 2 | 3 |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (47/72) | 70% (47/67) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 55% (26/47) | 49% (23/47) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 56% (14/25) | 50% (10/20) |
| Break Points Saved | 56% (5/9) | 40% (4/10) |
| Service Games | 64% (7/11) | 45% (5/11) |
| Ace % | 2.8% | 4.5% |
| Double Fault % | 2.8% | 6% |
| Return Rating | 216 | 169 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 51% (24/47) | 45% (21/47) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 50% (10/20) | 44% (11/25) |
| Break Points Won | 60% (6/10) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Games | 55% (6/11) | 36% (4/11) |
| Pressure Points | 58% (11/19) | 42% (8/19) |
| Service Points | 56% (40/72) | 49% (33/67) |
| Return Points | 51% (34/67) | 44% (32/72) |
| Total Points | 53% (74/139) | 47% (65/139) |
| Match Duration | 1h53m | |
Wang Xin. (Chn) – Masarova R. (Sui) 6-3 6-2
Xinyu Wang vs Rebeka Masarova – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Xinyu Wang | Rebeka Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 1.66 | 0.60 |
| Serve Rating | 283 | 216 |
| Aces | 4 | 0 |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (33/54) | 65% (37/57) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 85% (28/33) | 54% (20/37) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 48% (10/21) | 45% (9/20) |
| Break Points Saved | 0% (0/1) | 50% (4/8) |
| Service Games | 89% (8/9) | 56% (5/9) |
| Ace % | 7.4% | 0% |
| Double Fault % | 7.4% | 7% |
| Return Rating | 195 | 178 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 46% (17/37) | 15% (5/33) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 55% (11/20) | 52% (11/21) |
| Break Points Won | 50% (4/8) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Games | 44% (4/9) | 11% (1/9) |
| Pressure Points | 44% (4/9) | 56% (5/9) |
| Service Points | 70% (38/54) | 51% (29/57) |
| Return Points | 49% (28/57) | 30% (16/54) |
| Total Points | 59% (66/111) | 41% (45/111) |
| Match Duration | 1h20m | |
Oliynykova O. (Ukr) – Bondar A. (Hun) 6-4 6-4
Oliynykova vs Bondar – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Oliynykova | Bondar |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 1.27 | 0.79 |
| Serve Rating | 293 | 252 |
| Aces | 1 | 4 |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (39/59) | 74% (42/57) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 72% (28/39) | 71% (30/42) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 65% (13/20) | 33% (5/15) |
| Break Points Saved | 50% (1/2) | 25% (1/4) |
| Service Games | 90% (9/10) | 70% (7/10) |
| Ace % | 1.7% | 7% |
| Double Fault % | 1.7% | 0% |
| Return Rating | 201 | 123 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 29% (12/42) | 28% (11/39) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 67% (10/15) | 35% (7/20) |
| Break Points Won | 75% (3/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Games | 30% (3/10) | 10% (1/10) |
| Pressure Points | 67% (4/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Service Points | 69% (41/59) | 61% (35/57) |
| Return Points | 39% (22/57) | 31% (18/59) |
| Total Points | 54% (63/116) | 46% (53/116) |
| Match Duration | 1h28m | |
Potapova A. (Aut) – Zakharova A. (Wrl) 1-6 6-4 6-3
Anastasia Potapova vs Anastasia Zakharova – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Anastasia Potapova | Anastasia Zakharova |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 0.82 | 1.22 |
| Serve Rating | 227 | 253 |
| Aces | 4 | 1 |
| Double Faults | 7 | 1 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (52/98) | 56% (38/68) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 71% (37/52) | 61% (23/38) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 37% (17/46) | 67% (20/30) |
| Break Points Saved | 64% (7/11) | 33% (2/6) |
| Service Games | 69% (9/13) | 69% (9/13) |
| Ace % | 4.1% | 1.5% |
| Double Fault % | 7.1% | 1.5% |
| Return Rating | 170 | 159 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 39% (15/38) | 29% (15/52) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 33% (10/30) | 63% (29/46) |
| Break Points Won | 67% (4/6) | 36% (4/11) |
| Return Games | 31% (4/13) | 31% (4/13) |
| Pressure Points | 65% (11/17) | 35% (6/17) |
| Service Points | 55% (54/98) | 63% (43/68) |
| Return Points | 37% (25/68) | 45% (44/98) |
| Total Points | 48% (79/166) | 52% (87/166) |
| Match Duration | 2h09m | |
Zidansek T. (Slo) – Cirstea S. (Rom) 1-6 0-6
Tamara Zidansek vs Sorana Cirstea – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Tamara Zidansek | Sorana Cirstea |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 0.36 | 2.78 |
| Serve Rating | 163 | 305 |
| Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (25/34) | 54% (20/37) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 36% (9/25) | 80% (16/20) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 36% (4/11) | 71% (12/17) |
| Break Points Saved | 17% (1/6) | – (0/0) |
| Service Games | 17% (1/6) | 100% (7/7) |
| Ace % | 0% | 2.7% |
| Double Fault % | 0% | 2.7% |
| Return Rating | 49 | 294 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 20% (4/20) | 64% (16/25) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 29% (5/17) | 64% (7/11) |
| Break Points Won | – (0/0) | 83% (5/6) |
| Return Games | 0% (0/7) | 83% (5/6) |
| Pressure Points | 17% (1/6) | 83% (5/6) |
| Service Points | 32% (11/34) | 76% (28/37) |
| Return Points | 24% (9/37) | 68% (23/34) |
| Total Points | 28% (20/71) | 72% (51/71) |
| Match Set Duration | 0h53m | |
Yuan Y. (Chn) – Sorribes Tormo S. (Esp) 4-6 6-2 7-6(5)
Yue Yuan vs Sara Sorribes Tormo – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Yue Yuan | Sara Sorribes Tormo |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 1.05 | 0.95 |
| Serve Rating | 215 | 217 |
| Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (69/107) | 69% (72/104) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 59% (41/69) | 50% (36/72) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 39% (15/38) | 50% (16/32) |
| Break Points Saved | 22% (2/9) | 53% (9/17) |
| Service Games | 53% (8/15) | 47% (7/15) |
| Ace % | 0% | 1% |
| Double Fault % | 0% | 0% |
| Return Rating | 200 | 227 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 50% (36/72) | 41% (28/69) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 50% (16/32) | 61% (23/38) |
| Break Points Won | 47% (8/17) | 78% (7/9) |
| Return Games | 53% (8/15) | 47% (7/15) |
| Pressure Points | 38% (10/26) | 62% (16/26) |
| Service Points | 52% (56/107) | 50% (52/104) |
| Return Points | 50% (52/104) | 48% (51/107) |
| Total Points | 51% (108/211) | 49% (103/211) |
| Match Set Duration | 3h24m | |
Snigur D. (Ukr) (Q) vs. Cristian J. (Rou) 6-1 6-0
Daria Snigur vs Jaqueline Adina Cristian – Full Match Stats
| Statistic | Daria Snigur | Jaqueline Adina Cristian |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance Ratio | 2.03 | 0.49 |
| Serve Rating | 299 | 101 |
| Aces | 1 | 1 |
| Double Faults | 1 | 6 |
| 1st Serve % | 84% (31/37) | 48% (20/42) |
| 1st Serve Points Won | 65% (20/31) | 35% (7/20) |
| 2nd Serve Points Won | 67% (4/6) | 23% (5/22) |
| Break Points Saved | 67% (2/3) | 36% (4/11) |
| Service Games | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/7) |
| Ace % | 2.7% | 2.4% |
| Double Fault % | 2.7% | 14.3% |
| Return Rating | 306 | 118 |
| 1st Return Points Won | 65% (13/20) | 35% (11/31) |
| 2nd Return Points Won | 77% (17/22) | 33% (2/6) |
| Break Points Won | 64% (7/11) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Games | 100% (7/7) | 17% (1/6) |
| Pressure Points | 64% (9/14) | 36% (5/14) |
| Service Points | 65% (24/37) | 29% (12/42) |
| Return Points | 71% (30/42) | 35% (13/37) |
| Total Points | 68% (54/79) | 32% (25/79) |
| Match Duration | 0h55m | |
Round of 32
February 1-2
Raducanu E. (Gbr) – Minnen G. (Bel) 6-0 6-4
Bertea E. R. (Rou) – Juvan K. (Slo) 3-6 4-6
Chwalinska M. (Pol) (Q) – Bogdan A. (Rou) 6-3 6-2
Bulgaru M. (Rou) – Danilovic O. (Srb) 4-6 3-6
Wang Xin. (Chn) – Quevedo K. (Esp) (Q) 6-3 6-0
Ruse G. (Rou) – Masarova R. (Sui) 1-6 6-4 2-6
Sherif M. (Egy) – Oliynykova O. (Ukr) 7-6 4-6 4-6
Seidel E. (Ger) – Bondar A. (Hun) 6-4 6-7(6) 0-6
Potapova A. (Aut) – Bronzetti L. (Ita) 5-7 6-4 7-5
Pliskova Ka. (Cze) – Zakharova A. (Wrl) 6-4 2-6 2-6
Erjavec V. (Slo) – Zidansek T. (Slo) 1-6 4-6
Rakhimova K. (Uzb) – Cirstea S. (Rou) 4-6 4-6
Ruzic A. (Cro) – Yuan Y. (Chn) 4-6 7-5 2-6
Sorribes Tormo S. (Esp) – Tomova V. (Bul) 6-2 7-5
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T. (Fra) – Snigur D. (Ukr) (Q) 3-6 3-6
Stefanini L. (Ita) (Q) – Cristian J. (Rou) 2-6 6-2 5-7
Qualifying Draw Results
Qualifying – Final Round
Quevedo K. (Esp) – Shymanovich I. (Wrl) 2-6 6-1 6-3
Stefanini L. (Ita) – Zidansek T. (Slo) 6-1 5-7 6-0
Romero Gormaz L. (Esp) – Chwalinska M. (Pol) 6-7 4-6
Snigur D. (Ukr) – Bolsova Zadoinov A. (Esp) 6-3 6-3
Qualifying – Semi-finals
Gorgodze E. (Geo) – Zidansek T. (Slo) 7-6 2-6 1-6
Stefanini L. (Ita) – Szabo B. (Rou) 6-1 6-1
Quevedo K. (Esp) – Charaeva A. (Wrl) 7-6 6-2
Burillo Escorihuela I. (Esp) – Shymanovich I. (Wrl) 5-7 2-6
Gae M. (Rou) – Chwalinska M. (Pol) 2-6 3-6
Bolsova Zadoinov A. (Esp) – Lepchenko V. (Usa) 7-5 6-4
Romero Gormaz L. (Esp) – Serban R. (Cyp) 6-2 2-6 6-3
Snigur D. (Ukr) – Kalinina A. (Ukr) 6-3 6-1
Related WTA Articles You Might Enjoy
Cluj-Napoca 2025 Results: Complete List of Matches Including Qualifiers and Updates
Abu Dhabi Open 2026 Results: Full Tennis Scores, Daily Highlights and Key Stats (WTA 500)