Rybakina Escapes Madrid Trouble as Ruse Breaks the Stuttgart Champion’s Serve Five Times But Cannot Finish

Elena Rybakina prepares for the next point during a match at the Madrid Open 2026

Elena Rybakina came to Madrid with Stuttgart still fresh in the rear-view mirror of her second Porsche. For much of her second-round match, she looked far closer to the exit than to another title run.

Elena-Gabriela Ruse played the cleaner, more disruptive match for long stretches and even finished with the better dominance ratio, 1.05 to Rybakina’s 0.95. Yet the Romanian could not quite turn superiority into the result, as Rybakina scraped through 4-6, 6-3, 7-5.

Ruse makes Rybakina uncomfortable from the start

Ruse did not ease into the contest. She attacked Rybakina’s rhythm early, broke serve, and forced the Kazakh into the kind of unsettled baseline exchanges she usually avoids when in full flow.

Rybakina briefly pulled herself level at 3-3, but the problems did not disappear. Ruse broke again, backed it up with a hold to love, and served out the opening set 6-4 with the confidence of a player who had earned the lead rather than stumbled into it.

Elena-Gabriela Ruse vs Elena Rybakina – Set One Stats

StatisticElena-Gabriela RuseElena Rybakina
Dominance Ratio1.120.89
Winners29
Unforced Errors1524
Serve Rating268219
Aces00
Double Faults12
1st Serve %64% (18/28)50% (17/34)
1st Serve Points Won61% (11/18)71% (12/17)
2nd Serve Points Won64% (7/11)40% (8/20)
Break Points Saved0% (0/1)50% (2/4)
Service Games80% (4/5)60% (3/5)
Ace %0%0%
Double Fault %3.6%5.9%
Return Rating179195
1st Return Points Won29% (5/17)39% (7/18)
2nd Return Points Won60% (12/20)36% (4/11)
Break Points Won50% (2/4)100% (1/1)
Return Games40% (2/5)20% (1/5)
Pressure Points56% (5/9)44% (4/9)
Service Points61% (17/28)56% (19/34)
Return Points44% (15/34)39% (11/28)
Total Points52% (32/62)48% (30/62)
Set 1 Duration0h45m

The response comes, then wobbles

Rybakina appeared to have found the correction in the second set. She raced into a 4-0 lead, conceding only four points in that stretch and finally putting weight behind her first-strike patterns.

Still, even that did not settle the match. Ruse reeled off three straight games, including two breaks of the Rybakina serve, to get back on serve and restore the tension.

The Stuttgart champion eventually broke again and needed three attempts to level the match, but the set had already made one thing clear: Ruse was not going away quietly.

Elena-Gabriela Ruse vs Elena Rybakina – Set Two Stats

StatisticElena-Gabriela RuseElena Rybakina
Dominance Ratio0.751.34
Winners712
Unforced Errors1518
Serve Rating130224
Aces12
Double Faults11
1st Serve %42% (8/19)61% (22/36)
1st Serve Points Won25% (2/8)55% (12/22)
2nd Serve Points Won38% (5/13)47% (7/15)
Break Points Saved0% (0/3)0% (0/2)
Service Games25% (1/4)60% (3/5)
Ace %5.3%5.6%
Double Fault %5.3%2.8%
Return Rating238312
1st Return Points Won45% (10/22)75% (6/8)
2nd Return Points Won53% (8/15)62% (8/13)
Break Points Won100% (2/2)100% (3/3)
Return Games40% (2/5)75% (3/4)
Pressure Points33% (3/9)67% (6/9)
Service Points37% (7/19)53% (19/36)
Return Points47% (17/36)63% (12/19)
Total Points44% (24/55)56% (31/55)
Set Two Duration0h44m

Ruse leads again before Rybakina steals the finish

The final set only deepened Rybakina’s discomfort. Ruse moved ahead 3-1, again exposing vulnerability on serve and edging towards what would have been a second major Madrid upset.

Rybakina broke back, but even then the match remained on a knife-edge. One poor service game, one loose return sequence, one rushed forehand could have swung it either way.

At 5-5, Rybakina finally found the late break that mattered most. It was not a flourish, nor a clean takeover. It was survival tennis from a player good enough to win on days when the match keeps tilting the other way.

Elena-Gabriela Ruse vs Elena Rybakina – Deciding Set Stats

StatisticElena-Gabriela RuseElena Rybakina
Dominance Ratio0.931.08
Winners1010
Unforced Errors2116
Serve Rating249269
Aces11
Double Faults30
1st Serve %68% (25/37)63% (25/40)
1st Serve Points Won60% (15/25)72% (18/25)
2nd Serve Points Won56% (10/18)50% (9/18)
Break Points Saved50% (2/4)67% (2/3)
Service Games67% (4/6)83% (5/6)
Ace %2.7%2.5%
Double Fault %8.1%0%
Return Rating128167
1st Return Points Won28% (7/25)40% (10/25)
2nd Return Points Won50% (9/18)44% (8/18)
Break Points Won33% (1/3)50% (2/4)
Return Games17% (1/6)33% (2/6)
Pressure Points29% (4/14)71% (10/14)
Service Points62% (23/37)65% (26/40)
Return Points35% (14/40)38% (14/37)
Total Points48% (37/77)52% (40/77)
Set 3 Duration1h01m

The match stats show how close Ruse came

The full-match numbers make the escape even clearer. Ruse finished almost with the stronger dominance ratio, 0.95 to Rybakina’s 1.05, a striking detail.

Rybakina led the winner count 31 to 19, but her 58 unforced errors kept Ruse in command of large passages. Ruse made 51 errors herself, yet her ability to keep dragging Rybakina into uncomfortable points shaped the contest.

The difference came in conversion. Rybakina took six of eight break points, while Ruse converted five of nine. The Kazakh also edged the pressure points 10 to 7 and the total points 101 to 93.

Ruse had the better rhythm for much of the afternoon. Rybakina had the better timing at the end.

Zheng waits in the third round

Rybakina now moves into the third round, where Qinwen Zheng awaits. After Stuttgart, Madrid was supposed to test how smoothly her clay form could travel.

Instead, Elena-Gabriela Ruse made it a warning. Elena Rybakina survived it, but only just.